Quality Events

Deviation and quality event management

Know what is overdue, find the real cause, and close every deviation with the right signatures.

For quality teams replacing paper forms and Excel trackers, and preparing for Revised Schedule M inspections. Every event sits in one register with its status, and the investigation, signatures and linked CAPA stay on one record you can show an inspector.

The problem

When an auditor asks about a deviation, where do you look?

On paper and in Excel, one deviation ends up across forms, logbooks, spreadsheets, e-mail and a shared drive. Investigations run late and nobody sees it until the audit. Complere brings deviation management into your eQMS, with one record for each event and one list for all of them.

What counts as a quality event?
Overdue investigations

See today what is late

Filter the register to overdue events, with reminders before and after each due date.

See how it works
Repeat causes

Spot the causes that keep coming back

Everyone files against one cause library, and the list counts the events per cause.

See how it works
Weak root cause

Send a weak investigation back

A reviewer checks the reasoning and can return it, with a required reason on the record.

See how it works
Inspection questions

Answer from one record

The investigation, signatures, linked CAPA and audit trail all sit on the event.

See how it works

Follow one deviation from first report to signed closure

4 minutes 42 seconds on real product screens. Short on time? Jump to the chapter you care about.

Running time

Chapters

Read the transcript

0:00 The problem: one deviation, scattered everywhere

On a line, in a lab, or in a clinic, something goes wrong some days. The write-up is called a deviation, and it must be investigated and closed. The trouble is where it lives: paper forms and logbooks, spreadsheets and lists, e-mail and chat, a shared drive, and the old system nobody fully trusts. Something went wrong on batch twenty-four, one-seventeen. What was done about it, and is it closed?

0:26 One list for every deviation

Complere keeps every deviation in one list, and each row shows how far it has come. It calls them quality events.

0:36 One example: DEV-1, rated on a ready-made severity scale

Here is one; its ID is DEV-1. Batch 24-117 was a test run: broth instead of medicine, to prove the line stays sterile. Two vials turned cloudy: germs had grown in them. Luis Herrera reported it, with the batch, the room, and how serious it is: High, Major, so the next batch waits. That rating comes from a seven-level scale that ships ready to use, from negligible to catastrophic.

1:04 Where it started: a ready form

Luis didn't start from a blank page. The deviation template filled in the ID, the fields to record, who signs, and the deadline. Each kind of event gets its own template: set it up once, and every event of that kind starts the same way.

1:22 Set steps, a signer for each, and a time limit

In regulated work, each step needs a named person's sign-off before it moves on. So DEV-1 was logged, then investigated, then checked, then signed off by quality, and finally closed, each step with its own signer and time limit. Marcus Chen, who runs the case, signed first to open the investigation: which germ it was, the room's cleanliness records, and the gowning log.

1:47 What caused it: the built-in cause library

Amara Diallo, the investigator, picked the cause from a library that comes ready to use: seventeen categories and more than a hundred common causes, from human error to supplier issues. You decide which teams see them, and you add your own beside them. Everyone uses the same list, so you can see which problems keep coming back. DEV-1 was filed under Environment, where the germ turned up.

2:13 Why it happened: evidence, 5 Whys and a second check

Then she checked the evidence. The germ in the vials matched one found on a gown: a skin germ. She asked why, five times. Why on the gown? The operator had adjusted their goggles after putting gloves on. Why? The gowning steps never set that order, and nobody checked. She wrote down what it meant for other batches, and signed. Marcus Chen checked her work and signed: cause confirmed, a fix raised and linked, and a stop-gap in the meantime, with a second person checking the gowning before anyone goes in.

2:49 What it set in motion: linked records and where each stands

The fix became its own record, and so did everything it started. Each shows its status today. The corrective action, the plan to stop it happening again, has its tasks done, and the check that they worked is still open. The gowning procedure was rewritten. Of the two people trained on it, Luis has finished and Jake has not yet, so the training stays open. A risk assessment is under review. Each one links back to DEV-1.

3:17 Signed with a password, closed by quality

Nothing moves on until the named person signs with their password, and the record keeps their name, role and the time. Grace Kim, from the quality team, closed it on the second of October, with her reason on the record: cause confirmed, the fix tracked under the linked corrective action.

3:38 Every step kept: the audit trail

Every step is kept: who, when, and the note they signed with. That history is the audit trail, and it exports. Even retiring a closed deviation takes another signature and a written reason.

3:53 The answer, and what an inspector checks

The answer: the cause was the order of goggles and gloves. Amara Diallo investigated, Marcus Chen confirmed it, Grace Kim closed it on the second of October. Anything still open, like Jake's training, stays on the record with its status. Recorded and rated. Investigated to the cause. Impact assessed. Closed by quality. Every step recorded, every sign-off signed. A deadline on the record, the corrective action linked. Deviation handling you can show an inspector. See how one connected record can anchor your whole quality system. Request a demo.

Know what is overdue before an auditor asks

Set a target resolution time on the template, and each event carries a target date. The register shows you which ones have passed it.

Events register filtered to Overdue events, showing 2 of 2: DEV-5 Visible particulate at inspection, Awaiting QA sign-off, target date Sep 16, 2026, and DEV-6 Autoclave cycle fault, Under Evaluation, target date Oct 23, 2026
The register filtered to Overdue events in the demo: both are open and past their target dates, and the status shows the step each one is waiting on.

Set the time limit

Per template and per status, so each step has its own deadline.

Get reminded

E-mail reminders before and after the due date, as you configure them.

See your own list

Ongoing, Action Required and Over Due lists on the dashboard.

Events register listing DEV-1 to DEV-8: each row has its ID, title, status with progress dots, GMP Deviation template and site groups such as Raleigh Site and Basel Site

All events in one register, with their status and site.

One register

Replace the tracker spreadsheet

Every open and closed event sits in one list, and each row shows how far it has come.

  • Filter by status, template, severity or cause
  • Use groups for sites and teams
  • Export the list to CSV or Excel

Investigations that show their reasoning

The cause, the 5 Whys and the impact assessment sit on one form, and a reviewer checks them before quality signs.

DEV-1 inquiry form: event cause Environment, RCA Type options Open Text and 5 Whys, and all five whys of the root-cause analysis of the media-fill contamination, each with its answer

DEV-1, a demo deviation: the event cause, then all five whys with their answers.

Root cause

Ask why until you reach the process

The investigator picks the event cause from your library, then works through 5 Whys or writes the root cause as open text.

  • A reviewer checks it and can send it back to an earlier status, with a required reason, signed and on the audit trail
  • Attach supporting files such as PDF, DOCX and XLSX; administrators choose the allowed types
  • Post remarks, reply to them and attach files, so the discussion stays with the event
Get the free 5-Whys template
Risk and impact assessment type: Open Text, 3 * 3, 4 * 4 and 5 * 5 Risk Matrix, above DEV-1's written assessment of patient-safety risk, product impact and GMP impact, classified as a major deviation

DEV-1's written assessment, with the matrix options above it.

Risk and impact

Assess the impact on the same form

Write the risk and impact assessment as open text, or score it on a 3×3, 4×4 or 5×5 risk matrix.

See what keeps going wrong

Everyone files against one cause library, so you can compare the counts.

Event causes list: Environment with an Event Count of 2 and Equipment with 3, both User defined, beside the System cause Environmental Contamination, each with its group and event cause template
The Event Count on each cause, with your own causes beside the built-in ones.

Count every cause

An Event Count on every cause, and a register you can filter by cause or export.

Start with a full library

17 categories and more than a hundred common causes, so every investigator files against the same list from day one.

Add your own causes

Keep them beside the built-in ones, and decide which teams see which.

Severity levels list with seven entries, from Catastrophic to Negligible (Very Low), each Enabled, in the General group, type System, with a Total Events count

Seven built-in levels, each with its Total Events count.

Severity

Rate every event the same way

A seven-level scale from negligible to catastrophic is in place from day one, so teams stop inventing their own ratings. Each level shows how many events carry it.

  • Add your own levels beside the built-in ones
  • Built-in levels cannot be renamed or deleted
The lifecycle

Nothing closes without the right signatures

This is DEV-1, a demo deviation, on its real Workflows tab. The role beside a status is the one that signs while the event sits there, and each card keeps the signer, the time, the remark and the time spent in that status.

  1. Created card: minimum number of sign offs required by Coordinators: all. Marcus Chen signed on Aug 27, 2026 with the remark Investigation opened, asking QC Microbiology for the organism identification, the EM trend and the gowning log; 2 days 4 hours in this status

    1Created Coordinators

    Luis Herrera reports the event, and a coordinator signs to open the investigation. Marcus Chen's remark lists what the investigation needs: the organism identification, the EM trend and the gowning log.

  2. Under Inquiry card: minimum number of sign offs required by Inquiry officers: all. Amara Diallo signed on Sep 01, 2026 with the remark Inquiry complete and attached, reporting the same Gram-positive coccus on both turbid units and the airlock gown plate; 4 days 18 hours in this status

    2Under Inquiry Inquiry officers

    The investigator, in the Inquiry officers role, works the case and signs. Amara Diallo's remark records the finding: the same organism on both units and on the gown plate.

  3. Under Evaluation card: minimum number of sign offs required by Reviewers: all. Marcus Chen signed on Sep 06, 2026 with the remark Root cause confirmed, CAPA raised and linked, interim control of supervised gowning with a second-person check at the airlock; 5 days 1 hour in this status

    3Under Evaluation Reviewers

    A reviewer checks the investigation. Marcus Chen's remark confirms the root cause, names the linked CAPA and sets a stop-gap: a second person checks gowning at the airlock.

  4. Awaiting QA sign-off card: minimum number of sign offs required by QAS: all. Grace Kim signed on Oct 02, 2026 with the remark Deviation closed, the procedure revision and re-qualification tracked under the linked CAPA and its change control; 3 weeks 5 days in this status

    4Awaiting QA sign-off QAS

    Quality signs last, under the QAS role. Grace Kim's remark closes the deviation and says where the rest is tracked: under the linked CAPA and its change control.

  5. Closed card, status updated on Oct 02, 2026

    5Closed

    All signatures are in place, and nobody signs at this status. The card keeps the date the event closed.

Bottlenecks show up on the record: DEV-1 waited 3 weeks 5 days at QA sign-off, and the card says so.

Six questions an inspector asks about a deviation

And where the answer sits in Complere.

Was every deviation recorded and rated?

The register, with a severity level on each event.

Was it investigated to the cause?

The Inquiry Form, with 5 Whys and the cause library.

Was the impact assessed?

The risk and impact assessment on the same form.

Did quality close it?

Awaiting QA sign-off, signed with a password.

Who did what, and when?

The audit trail, the Roles tab and the signatures.

Was it on time, and is the fix tracked?

The target resolution date and the Linked Items tab.

Electronic signature step, Escalate status to Closed: a warning that signing an electronic record is equivalent to a hand-written signature, then a password field, a Remark field and the Sign button

Moving to Closed: the warning, then the signer's password.

Electronic signature

Only the named role can move it on

A status moves on only when the named role signs with their password. The signature keeps their name, role, the time and any reason they enter.

See the FDA 21 CFR Part 11 and EU GMP Annex 11 controls
Audit trail row: the event has been signed by the QAS and its status updated from Awaiting QA sign-off to Closed, with the remark, action type Change Status, Grace Kim and Oct 02, 2026, below the Export button

DEV-1's audit trail: Grace Kim's closing signature, with the remark and the time.

Audit trail

A history you can export

Immutable audit trail — database-enforced. Audit records cannot be modified or deleted, enforced by database-level constraints.

  • Who, when, the remark, and each changed field's previous and current value
  • A trail on each record, plus a module-wide view for Administrators and Managers
  • Export to CSV, Excel or PDF
  • Every e-mail sent stays on the event's Emails tab
How the audit trail works

Keep the fix tied to the deviation

The corrective action, the procedure change and the training each get their own record, and the event links to them.

CAPA-1 Linked Items tab: the document Aseptic Gowning Procedure, and the event Media-fill contamination, Batch 24-117, Grade B filling suite, each with its relationship

CAPA-1, the corrective action DEV-1 led to: its Linked Items tab names the procedure and the deviation.

Linked Items

One tab for what the event started

Link an event to records in Documents, CAPAs, Change Requests and Training, and see them on its Linked Items tab. A closed deviation keeps its links, so open work does not disappear.

What happens to the work after closure

Each follow-up keeps its own record and status, and you can hand over the event as a PDF.

CAPA

Track the fix and check it worked

The CAPA holds the actions and the effectiveness check.

How CAPA works
Change control

Change how you work, under control

Link a Change Request when the fix changes a process.

How change control works
Training

Retrain the people affected

Link the training that follows the event.

How training works
PDF reports

Hand over the event as a PDF

Report templates carry variables that fill from the record, and authorised users download the PDF.

Set it up to match your SOP

Each kind of event you handle gets its own template. Start with one, and add the rest when you are ready.

GMP Deviation event template: group Axcel Pharma All Staff, prefix DEV, default event title Deviation, target resolution time 14 days, a Roles Configuration panel for Coordinators, Reviewers, Inquiry officers and QAS, the labels Sterile-Ops and Batch-Linked, and three products

The demo GMP Deviation template: prefix DEV, target resolution time 14 days.

Event templates

Start every event from your template

A template sets the ID prefix, default title, target resolution time, departments, products, labels and your own fields, and every new event starts from it.

  • Custom fields on the main form or inside the inquiry section
  • Switch default fields on or off
  • Groups control who can use a template
New event form, step 1 of 4, Basic Details: group, event template GMP Deviation, ID prefix DEV, an auto-generated tentative ID, title Deviation, labels and severity level, with the custom fields Batch Number and Cleanroom Grade beside them

A new deviation: the template has filled the prefix, title and labels, and added Batch Number and Cleanroom Grade.

Reporting

Report it fast, complete it later

Use the Minimal form for a quick first report, or the Full form for everything at once. Complere generates the ID from the prefix.

  • Tag the product, department or contact, and the supplier if you use Supplier Management
  • Keep the person who reported it updated at the statuses you choose
Signer settings: a Default QAS field that fills in on the create form, then the options Configure Preliminary reviewers and Configure Initiators, both unticked, each with its explanation

Default signers fill in on the form. Preliminary reviewers and Initiators are options you can turn on.

Who signs

Your signers, your sign-off rules

Choose the signers for each role, how many must sign, and default signers per role.

  • Add a preliminary review step if your SOP has one

Schedule M, validation, go-live, pricing and your data

What a quality head asks before booking a demo.

Revised Schedule M

Getting ready for a Schedule M inspection?

Move deviations off paper before the inspector arrives: every investigation, signature and linked CAPA on one record, with its audit trail.

Talk to us about your site
Validation

The validation pack is included

Nine validation artefacts per module, delivered on day one and included with the licence.

See what ships in the pack
Past records

Bring your past records with you

Import your paper and legacy records into Complere, and keep a record of exactly what came across.

How it works
Going live

Time to your first controlled record

About a week on the pilot, 2 to 4 weeks on Foundation and 4 to 8 on Professional. The rollout plan covers the rest.

See the rollout plan
Free pilot

Prove it on one workflow

A 30-day pilot on one workflow, for one site or team, with no licence fee.

Start with pilot
Pricing

Enterprise features at an affordable price

Built so small manufacturers and start-ups can use it too. Every plan includes the same audit trail, e-signatures and validation pack, and your quote is scoped to your team.

Compare plans
Your data

Your own database

Each customer gets its own database and storage bucket.

See the Trust Center
Help Center

Read how it works

Step-by-step guides for creating, investigating and signing events.

Open the Events guides
Not ready yet?

Start with our free templates

Use the deviation checklist and the 5-Whys template on your next investigation.

Get the deviation checklist

Frequently asked questions

What quality teams ask when they move deviations off paper and Excel.

What is a quality event in Complere?

It is the record of something that went wrong and has to be investigated and closed. A deviation is the usual example. Each kind of event your SOPs define gets its own template, with its own prefix, fields and time limit.

Does Complere help with Revised Schedule M?

Complere gives your site the records for deviation handling: a signed investigation, a root cause, a linked CAPA and an audit trail. Meeting Revised Schedule M stays with your site and your quality system.

How do we stop every root cause ending up as human error?

Three things help. The 5 Whys makes the investigator show the reasoning on the record. A reviewer checks it and can send it back with a required reason. And the Event Count on each cause shows you when one cause is being overused.

What happens to our past deviations on paper and in Excel?

Import your paper and legacy records into Complere. Enter them into our spreadsheet templates, check the results before anything goes live, and keep a record of exactly what came across.

Does a deviation stay open until its CAPA closes?

The deviation closes when quality signs it. The CAPA keeps its own status and its effectiveness check, linked to the event, so the open work stays visible after closure. Your SOP decides when quality signs.

Who signs at each status?

Coordinators sign at Created, Inquiry officers at Under Inquiry, Reviewers at Under Evaluation and QAS at Awaiting QA sign-off. Nobody signs at Closed. You choose the signers for each role and the minimum number of sign-offs, and you can add a preliminary review.

Do we need a consultant to build the forms?

No code is involved. An administrator sets up the templates, custom fields and signers in the module settings. Custom fields can be text, number, date or dropdown, on the main form or inside the inquiry section.

Can we run one site or one event type first?

Yes. Set up one template, run it for one site or team, and add the rest when you are ready. That is how the free pilot works.

We make product for other companies. Can we keep a customer informed?

You can add recipients from outside the system on an event, and every e-mail sent stays on the event's Emails tab. Authorised users can also download the event as a PDF built from your report template.

Can a closed event be reopened?

Yes, if you turn on that optional setting. Reopening takes a signature and a required reason, and the signer chooses the status it lands on. Retiring a closed event as Obsolete takes a signature and a written reason, and it then drops out of the default list. Both are in the audit trail.

What can we export?

The audit trail exports to CSV, Excel and PDF, and events lists export to CSV and Excel. Authorised users can also download an event as a PDF built from a report template.

Bring your last overdue deviation to the demo

We will walk it through Complere with you, from the first report to closure, or start a free pilot on one workflow.